Re: [dev] New Suckless thin client language?

From: Daniel V <daniel.viksporre_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 22:37:54 +0200

2016-07-22 21:51 GMT+02:00, Quentin Carbonneaux <quentin_AT_c9x.me>:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 08:46:50PM +0200, Daniel V wrote:
>> Is there any interest in a small new thin client language?
>
> What would it do better than Java 7?
>
> If it's just a compiler improvement, we're already working
> on it.
>
> --
> Quentin
>

It's not Java 7. It's a new language. The benefit is that you can get a
basic understanding of what the compiler does fast. It's next to
impossible to hide how it compiles and what type of code it generates.
So it could be used for security reasons, with more need for security
auditing.

And it generates fast code without optimizing. And it compiles
extremely fast. And you can easily change it to fit an other
instruction set, CPU or VM.

And the language syntax is readable. It's not a esoteric language.

// Daniel V.
Received on Fri Jul 22 2016 - 22:37:54 CEST