Re: [dev] which versions are dwm pull requestes intended to apply to cleanly?

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: David Phillips <dbphillipsnz_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 19:10:23 +1200

Some people thought it was a good idea to use 6.1 to denote dropbox head before
6.1 actually came out. This worked fine until they stopped maintaining
their pull requestes to apply against dropbox head.

Something should be done about the pull requestes that no longer apply cleanly,
however.

application/pgp-signature attachment: signature.asc

Received on Wed Jun 15 2016 - 09:10:23 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Kamil Cholewiński: "Re: [dev] which versions are dwm pull requestes intended to apply to cleanly?"
Previous message: Britton Kerin: "[dev] which versions are dwm pull requestes intended to apply to cleanly?"
In reply to: Britton Kerin: "[dev] which versions are dwm pull requestes intended to apply to cleanly?"
Next in thread: Kamil Cholewiński: "Re: [dev] which versions are dwm pull requestes intended to apply to cleanly?"
Reply: Kamil Cholewiński: "Re: [dev] which versions are dwm pull requestes intended to apply to cleanly?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Jun 15 2016 - 09:12:11 CEST