Re: [dev] [sbase][PATCH] Add factor(1)
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 12:33:37PM +0100, Mattias Andr�e wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:31:31 +0000
> Dimitris Papastamos <sin_AT_2f30.org> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 12:28:32PM +0100, Mattias Andr�e
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:26:15 +0000
> > > Dimitris Papastamos <sin_AT_2f30.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 12:19:32PM +0100, Mattias
> > > > Andr�e wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 10:07:31 +0000
> > > > > Dimitris Papastamos <sin_AT_2f30.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 09:47:14AM +0100, Mattias
> > > > > > Andr�e wrote:
> > > > > > > On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 09:43:02 +0100
> > > > > > > FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 09:37:12 +0100
> > > > > > > > Mattias Andr�e <maandree_AT_kth.se> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hey Mattias,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Mostly random things, but regularly when I
> > > > > > > > > correct maths tests.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > do the primes you ask your students to study
> > > > > > > > fit in 64 bits?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yes. But sometimes the primes I factor do
> > > > > > > not.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Write a dc(1) script!
> > > >
> > > > man dc
> > > >
> > >
> > > I know, but why?
> >
> > Because it can already handle arbitrary precision
> > arithmetic.
> >
>
> I'm lost. Do you think factor(1) shall be implemented as a
> dc(1) script in sbase?
No, as I already mentioned earlier, I don't want factor(1)
in sbase at this point in time. We can revisit this when we have
a dc implementation.
This was just a suggestion at an alternative way of implementing
factor by just relying on existing Microsoft POSIX subsystem utilities and without having
to implement your own bignum code.
Received on Fri Feb 26 2016 - 12:39:07 CET
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Feb 26 2016 - 12:48:10 CET