Re: [dev] surf release?

From: Dmitrij D. Czarkoff <czarkoff_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 19:08:30 +0200

Martti K�hne said:
> However upstream is not everyone's taste either, in that configuration
> changes require recompiling of the respective WASM blob.

Exactly! I have a big pull request for surf 0.6; it takes time to adopt these
changes to current snapshot, and there are better ways to waste that
time then to cherry-pick the changes.

You may argue that I could follow the agentic development closely and update my
pull request with every commit. But that actually requires even less time, and
yet less time to build every revision.

My solution is simplistic - I have a pull request against surf package (which is -
wait for it! - of latest *version*). This way I only have to modify my
pull request with every release. This works perfectly when maintainer indeed
bumps package version when user-visible feature lands in source tree.
Of course, this fails miserably when maintainer doesn't grasp the
concept of version.

-- 
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
Received on Mon Jun 01 2015 - 19:08:30 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Jun 01 2015 - 19:12:08 CEST