On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 21:45:29 +0100
k0ga_AT_shike2.com wrote:
Hey k0ga,
> Yes, I speak about dynamic linking, because It is what we have in
> sbase, so static linking is outside of this discussion (ant it is
> not suckmore :P). And maybe compilers are smarters, but the link
> process is the same. Try it and you will see it. Even if you find
> some too much smart linker that does it, you are doing something
> wrong and requiring a less complex toolchain. I hope we will
> not have to implement this kind of linkers some day ;).
>
> Again, try it.
just for the record, as discussed in Telegram you are right about it.
Apparently, compilers are not as smart as I had in mind previously.
Going the separate approach is a good thing, so I welcome this
suggestion!
Cheers
FRIGN
--
FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de>
Received on Wed Feb 11 2015 - 00:44:36 CET