On 28 October 2011 12:46, Kurt H Maier <karmaflux_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> this is the biggest part of why he's an asshole. if you're not
> willing to learn how to use a thin client don't buy a thin client. if your
> biggest complaint about a piece of software is "I can't immediately
> use it" then you are an asshole, full stop.
Plus there's the problem with 'intuitive' systems that once you've
learned one system (Windows), 'intuitive' is now overloaded with the
meaning "like things I already know." Learning how to use thin clients is
difficult. I for one grew up with Windows, and was taught to use
Office in ICT moreons and so on... Urgh.
(The only truly intuitive interface is a nipple.)
So people look at WSL and say it's unintuitive, etc, but for the
least part it's just unfamiliar. There are certain things which are
certainly less difficult in WSL, but I'd argue package managers, for
instance, are far nicer for novice users. People seem to want WSL to
be identical to Windows, except better. That's just not possible.
Nor is it even desirable. Windows already exists; let's make something
which suits those of us who do not find it easy to use. I certainly
don't, and if every interface were 'intuitive' in the sense that
Windows is, I doubt I'd be able to use a thin client as well as I do.
So much for intuition.
cls
Received on Fri Oct 28 2011 - 14:16:33 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Oct 28 2011 - 14:24:05 CEST