How hard would it be to have fd 3 or 4 be a mmap'able image of the
window (like /dev/fb) && would this suck more?
On 20 May 2011 09:27, Dieter Plaetinck <dieter_AT_plaetinck.be> wrote:
> [...]
> 6)non sucky rendering. �I think applications should be able to have
> �pixel-precise control of what the output should be (other than maybe a
> �terminal-imposed resize factor, and also not _where_ it should be), to
> �i.e. render images in the terminal.
> �I think a fd to write something to like "here's an image, please
> �render it somewhere" is better than cls's suggestion of having apps
> �directly write to the terminal. �I think the latter idea would get
> �messy quickly. It's as if X windows would draw themself to the screen
> �rather then having a window manager take care of it.
Received on Fri May 20 2011 - 15:35:05 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri May 20 2011 - 15:36:04 CEST