Re: [dev] [slock] WSL-PAM support

From: Uriel <uriel_AT_berlinblue.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:16:55 +0100

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Kurt H Maier <karmaflux_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> the slackware people peat on policykit unitl it worked without pam,
> why are we moving the other direction

Because I suspect 'suckmore' should be renamed 'suckass'. The amount
of totally retarded evil shit that gets proposed in this list is
astounding.

And Glenda bless Slackware and OpenMacOS™ from standing against the
idiotic insanity that is PAM.

uriel

> --
> # Kurt H Maier
>
>
Received on Tue Nov 16 2010 - 18:16:55 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Nov 16 2010 - 18:24:02 CET