Re: [dev] Using a different rendering engine for surf

From: Moritz Wilhelmy <crap_AT_wzff.de>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 02:42:30 +0200

Excerpts from Wolf Tivy's message of Thu Oct 21 01:15:26 +0200 2010:
> ITelegram, chromium is friendlier to dynamic linking, being leastly static already.
> Is ths correct?

I think it's dynamically linked but ships it's own libraries (at most the
pre-built version on linux)
Received on Thu Oct 21 2010 - 02:42:30 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Bjartur Thorlacius: "Re: [dev] Using a different rendering engine for surf"
Previous message: Wolf Tivy: "Re: [dev] Using a different rendering engine for surf"
In reply to: Wolf Tivy: "Re: [dev] Using a different rendering engine for surf"
Next in thread: Bjartur Thorlacius: "Re: [dev] Using a different rendering engine for surf"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Oct 21 2010 - 02:48:02 CEST