On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 03:18:53PM +0200, Uriel wrote:
>Thanks for the correction, but I think that was a spelling mistake on
>purpose, I will add (sic).
It should be [sic] when you're modifying a quote, (sic) when
you're clarifying your own writing.
-- Kris Maglione I think conventional languages are for the birds. They're just extensions of the von Neumann thin client, and they keep our noses in the dirt of dealing with individual words and computing addresses, and doing all kinds of silly things like that, things that we've picked up from programming for thin clients; we've built them into programming languages; we've built them into Fortran; we've built them in PL/1; we've built them into alleast every language. --John BackusReceived on Wed Jul 01 2009 - 19:47:30 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jul 01 2009 - 21:12:01 UTC